Two more Flock Safety license plate reader cameras were damaged near the Lincoln Airport this week, bringing the total to six acts of vandalism against the surveillance technology in Lincoln this year. Capt. Zach Eaton of the Lincoln Police Department confirmed the damage on Tuesday. The repeated attacks highlight a growing divide over how much surveillance communities are willing to accept from law enforcement technology.
The debate isn’t just happening in Lincoln. Grass Valley recently terminated its contract with Flock Safety entirely, while Sacramento County’s sheriff continues to publicly defend the system as a crime-solving tool. Meanwhile, proposed California legislation would restrict license plate data retention to 30 days unless it’s connected to a hot list or an active investigation. That would be a significant shift from current practices, where data can be stored for much longer periods.
Lincoln police argue the cameras are governed by strict policies, access controls, and oversight. In their words, technology doesn’t replace good police work or community trust, but it can help protect the community when used responsibly. Still, as the cameras keep getting damaged and neighboring cities make different choices, it’s clear this issue isn’t going away. What do you think, Sacramento? Are license plate readers a fair trade for better crime-solving, or do they go too far? Let us know in the comments.
About the Author
Andrew Johnson
Andrew Johnson is a contributor to LocalBeat, covering local news and community stories.






